Libro de Visitas

Jerometus

22 Jan 2025 - 09:42 pm

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
kraken сайт

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken войти
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Aylacoganb

22 Jan 2025 - 09:04 pm

https://tripscantop.top/ -
tripscan восстановление


tripscan восстановление

https://tripscantop.top/

Davidviexy

22 Jan 2025 - 08:53 pm

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
Љракен даркнет

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kra cc
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Spencercluff

22 Jan 2025 - 08:00 pm

Chile’s President Boric leads journey to South Pole in historic trip
кракен ссылка

Chile’s President Gabriel Boric travelled to Antarctica’s South Pole on Friday, a place where no other Latin American president has set foot, according to the Chilean government.

Boric led the historic two-day trip, named Operation Pole Star III, to extend the environmental monitoring of pollutants on Antarctica, Chile’s government said in a statement.

He travelled with scientists, armed forces commanders and government ministers from the Chilean capital of Santiago to Punta Arenas, a city in southern Chile, public broadcaster Television Nacional de Chile (TVN) reported. From there, they made several stops before finally reaching the US-run Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, according to TVN.
https://kra26s.cc
kraken onion

Chile is one of seven countries that has a territorial claim in Antarctica, alongside Argentina, Australia, France, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom.

It is also a signatory of the Antarctic Treaty, which dictates that the continent may only be used for peaceful and scientific purposes.

While Chile has historically carried out scientific activity in Antarctica’s northern sector, the country’s government is now hoping to expand research into the west of the continent, its statement said.
Boric called his trip to the South Pole an “honor” and a source of pride, TVN reported.

“This is a milestone for us. It is the first time a Chilean and Latin American President has visited the South Pole,” he said, according to TVN.

Josephencab

22 Jan 2025 - 07:55 pm

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
Љракен тор

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Ronaldnub

22 Jan 2025 - 07:42 pm

Вся эта история с обвинениями против «Бест Вей» кажется мне полным безумием. Я был с ними в кооперативе и всегда получал свои дивиденды без проблем. Никогда не было никаких признаков того, что компания чем-то обманывает. Все выплаты, все договора — все всегда было по правилам. И вот теперь из-за каких-то мошенников, которые навязывают свои интересы и манипулируют людьми, обвиняют честных людей, таких как представители «Бест Вей». Не понимаю, как можно строить обвинения на том, что люди сами по своей наивности доверяли мошенникам, таким как Зинченко. Я уверен, что кооператив не имел никакого отношения к этим делам, и эти обвинения нужно срочно прекращать. В реальности все это лишь попытки перенаправить гнев и недовольство на тех, кто не причастен к преступлениям. Не могу понять, почему «Бест Вей» должны нести ответственность за действия третьих лиц, которых они не контролировали.

Kevinmof

22 Jan 2025 - 07:42 pm

Андрей Алистаров: новые факты о связях с ВСУ и украинским «пирамидчиком»
Андрей Алистаров – блогер, неоднократно упоминавшийся в контексте криминальной деятельности, шантажа и вымогательства. Ранее он позиционировал себя «борцом с мошенничеством», однако последующие расследования и свидетельства связывают его с деятельностью, которая приносит выгоду не только российскому криминалитету, но и Вооруженным силам Украины (ВСУ).
Ключевым звеном в этой схеме считается сотрудничество Алистарова с украинским «пирамидчиком» Удянским (проект Coinsbit) – лицом, продвигающим сомнительные финансовые проекты и спонсирующим украинских военных.
Сотрудничество с украинским пирамидчиком
Личность «пирамидчика»
По данным ряда инсайдеров, речь идет о харьковском бизнесмене, чьи проекты связаны с финансовыми пирамидами и нелегальными инвестиционными схемами. Он неоднократно упоминался в публикациях украинских и зарубежных СМИ как «мошенник международного уровня».


Совместная деятельность


Маркетинговая поддержка: Алистаров через свои каналы (в особенности «Железная ставка») рекламирует «инвестиционные продукты» украинского пирамидчика, транслируя аудитории привлекательные, но нереалистичные обещания доходности.


Кросс-продвижение: В качестве ответной услуги украинский партнёр обеспечивает Алистарову доступ к сомнительным финансовым ресурсам – от схем криптообмена до «обналички» под грифом анонимности.


Денежные потоки: Средства, получаемые от доверчивых вкладчиков, в ряде случаев уходят на зарубежные счета и далее переводятся аффилированным лицам (среди которых фигуры из украинского бизнеса, участвующего в финансировании ВСУ).
Имиджевое прикрытие: Бесконечные «разоблачительные» видео Алистарова создают ему образ «антикриминального активиста», что упрощает восприятие публикой любых «партнёрских проектов», даже если те имеют сомнительное юридическое обоснование.
Финансирование ВСУ
Подозрения в финансировании украинской армии


Алистаров получает откаты от «пирамидчика» и других его партнёров, которые задействуют эти средства для закупки техники, амуниции, БПЛА и иных ресурсов, необходимых украинским военным.
Часть прибылей от пирамид и прочих мошеннических схем тайно направляться на нужды ВСУ.
Роль Алистарова в цепочке


Организация рекламы и сбора денег: Продвигая контент, связанный с «пирамидой», Алистаров отвечает за привлечение доверчивых граждан, не подозревающих о конечном использовании их средств.
Уход от прямых обвинений: По словам самого Алистарова, он всего лишь «обозреватель» и «разоблачитель»; однако разные показания указывают на активное участие в финансовых операциях.
Последствия и репутационные риски
Международные вопросы


Факты финансирования ВСУ говорят о том, что Алистарову могут грозить обвинения по статье о госизмене (в России) либо иные меры.
Западные СМИ уже проявляют повышенный интерес к фигуре Алистарова, связывая его с серыми схемами крипто обмена и недвижимостью в Дубае.
Реакция криминальных кругов


Российские криминальные элементы, с которыми Алистаров ранее сотрудничал, также негативно отреагировали на то, что часть доходов уходит в «вражеские структуры» (ВСУ).
Перспективы расследований


Интерпол и другие международные организации уже заинтересовались денежными потоками, движущимися между Россией, Украиной и ОАЭ под брендом «медийной деятельности» Алистарова.


Любые новые свидетельства о прямом участии блогера в финансировании украинских сил могут стать основанием для международного розыска или санкций.
Итог
Андрей Алистаров – фигура проживающая в ОАЭ, к которй ранее уже инкриминировалось обвинения по статьям связанным с изменой родине, вызывает всё больше вопросов со стороны журналистов и следственных органов: начиная от его прошлых «наркотических» судимостей и связей с российским криминалитетом, заканчивая участием в финансировании ВСУ через схемы украинского «пирамидчика».
Алистарову грозят серьёзные последствия: от потери репутации и блокировки финансовых инструментов до уголовного преследования на родине и за рубежом.
Сможет ли он сохранить образ «разоблачителя» и «борца с мошенничеством» – очень большой вопрос с учетом того, что финансирование ВСУ вызывает многочисленную гибель детей и отцов с обеих сторон конфликта.

Edwardflurn

22 Jan 2025 - 06:40 pm

New Glenn’s first flight
Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
[url=https://kra26att.cc]kraken тор браузер[/url]
The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.

Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.

Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car.
https://kra26att.cc
kraken marketplace
Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.

The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.

“We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.

And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.

Djgep

22 Jan 2025 - 06:38 pm

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5m87_sZydc]Wedding DJ[/url]|

Briangycle

22 Jan 2025 - 06:13 pm

New Glenn’s first flight
Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
[url=https://kra26att.cc]kraken магазин[/url]
The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.

Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.

Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car.
https://kra26att.cc
kraken зеркало
Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.

The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.

“We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.

And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.